Explain what the constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review entails? Skip to main content

Explain what the constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review entails?


Question: Explain what the constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review entails?

The constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review refers to the process by which the constitution of a country is used to control the actions of the government and to provide a means for citizens to challenge those actions.

Constitutionalisation of administrative action means that the constitution is used to set out the powers and duties of the government, and to establish the principles that the government must follow when exercising its powers. This includes requiring the government to act fairly, reasonably, and proportionately.

Judicial review is the power of the courts to review the actions of the government and to declare them invalid if they are found to be unlawful. This power is often derived from the constitution itself, but it can also be granted by statute.

The constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review are important because they help to protect the rights of citizens and to ensure that the government is accountable to the people.

Here are some examples of how the constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review can be used to protect the rights of citizens:

  • A citizen can challenge a government decision that they believe is unfair or discriminatory.
  • A citizen can challenge a government decision that they believe is based on incorrect or irrelevant information.
  • A citizen can challenge a government decision that they believe is beyond the government's powers.

The constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review are also important for the separation of powers. The separation of powers is a system of government in which the power of the government is divided between different branches, such as the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This system is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.

The constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review help to ensure that the executive branch does not abuse its powers. The courts can review the actions of the executive branch and strike them down if they are found to be unlawful. This helps to keep the executive branch accountable to the people.

The constitutionalisation of administrative action and judicial review are important tools for protecting the rights of citizens and for ensuring that the government is accountable to the people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

अज्ञेय का वैवाहिक जीवन उतार-चढ़ाव भरा था, वर्णन कीजिए? Aage ka vaivahik jivan utar chadhav bhara tha varnan kijiye

सवाल: अज्ञेय का वैवाहिक जीवन उतार-चढ़ाव भरा था, वर्णन कीजिए? अज्ञेय का वैवाहिक जीवन उतार-चढ़ाव भरा था। उन्होंने दो विवाह किए, लेकिन दोनों विवाह सफल नहीं हो पाए। उनका पहला विवाह 1937 में राजकुमारी रत्नलता से हुआ था। यह विवाह अज्ञेय के परिवार की इच्छा के विरुद्ध था। अज्ञेय के पिता हीरानंद वात्स्यायन संस्कृत के विद्वान थे और वे चाहते थे कि अज्ञेय एक योग्य विदुषी से विवाह करें। रत्नलता एक साधारण परिवार से थीं और वे संस्कृत नहीं जानती थीं। इस कारण से, अज्ञेय के परिवार वालों ने इस विवाह का विरोध किया। अज्ञेय और रत्नलता का विवाह कुछ वर्षों तक चलता रहा, लेकिन अंततः उनका तलाक हो गया। इस तलाक के कई कारण थे, जिनमें अज्ञेय की व्यस्त जीवनशैली, रत्नलता की शिक्षा और सामाजिक पृष्ठभूमि में अंतर, और अज्ञेय के परिवार का विरोध शामिल था। अज्ञेय का दूसरा विवाह 1956 में कपिला मलिक से हुआ था। कपिला एक मशहूर संगीतकार थीं और वे अज्ञेय की साहित्यिक प्रतिभा की प्रशंसक थीं। यह विवाह कुछ वर्षों तक चलता रहा, लेकिन अंततः यह भी विफल हो गया। इस विफलता के कारणों में अज्ञेय के व्यस्त जीवनशैली, कपिला की स्वतंत्रताप्रियता,...

Explain voter apathy indifference among the youth considered a challenge for south africa democracy?

Question: Explain voter apathy indifference among the youth considered a challenge for south africa democracy?  Voter apathy and indifference among the youth pose significant challenges to South Africa's democracy. When young people disengage from the electoral process, it undermines the representativeness and legitimacy of the government. Low youth voter turnout means that the voices and concerns of young South Africans are underrepresented in policymaking, leading to policies that may not adequately address issues crucial to them, such as unemployment, education, and access to healthcare. This lack of participation can also empower special interests and entrenched elites, further marginalizing young people's voices in the political process. Additionally, voter apathy among the youth can contribute to political instability, as a significant portion of the population feels unheard and unrepresented, 

List four social beliefs in south africa that contribute to the high frequency of sexual assault?

Question: List four social beliefs in south africa that contribute to the high frequency of sexual assault? Four societal beliefs in South Africa that contribute to the high frequency of sexual assault include: Gender Inequality and Patriarchy – Deep-rooted patriarchal structures place men in positions of power, leading to the normalization of violence against women and reinforcing male dominance. Victim-Blaming Attitudes – Many believe that victims are responsible for the assault due to their behavior, clothing, or choices, discouraging them from reporting incidents and allowing perpetrators to act without accountability. Cultural Norms Surrounding Masculinity – Traditional views of masculinity emphasize aggression and dominance, leading some men to feel entitled to assert power over women through sexual violence. Silence and Stigma Around Sexual Violence – Many victims fear speaking out due to societal stigma, allowing abuse to go unreported and perpetrators to continue their actions...