Write two selection rules for electronic spectra? Skip to main content

Write two selection rules for electronic spectra?

Write two selection rules for electronic spectra?


Question: Write two selection rules for electronic spectra?

In the realm of electronic spectra, two fundamental selection rules govern the transitions that can occur between energy levels:

1. Laporte Rule (Orbital Selection Rule):

This rule states that transitions between electronic states with the same symmetry (g or u) are forbidden in centrosymmetric molecules. In simpler terms, molecules with a center of symmetry cannot exhibit electronic transitions that involve only the redistribution of electrons within a single subshell (like p to p or d to d).

Here's an analogy: Imagine a molecule as a mirror image of itself across its center. If the electronic transition doesn't alter this mirrored symmetry, it's forbidden by the Laporte rule. However, the rule relaxes for vibrations that break the molecule's symmetry, allowing for vibronic coupling and hence, weak transitions.

2. Spin Selection Rule:

This rule dictates that the total spin quantum number (S) must remain unchanged during an electronic transition. In other words, the sum of the individual electron spins before and after the transition must be the same. This rule applies to both singlet (S = 0) and triplet (S = 1) states.

Think of spin as the intrinsic angular momentum of an electron. The spin selection rule ensures that the overall rotation of the electrons doesn't change significantly during the transition. Exceptions to this rule exist for heavy atoms with strong spin-orbit coupling, but they are relatively rare.

These two selection rules play a crucial role in understanding and interpreting electronic spectra. They help us predict which transitions are allowed and explain the intensities of observed bands in spectra. By understanding these rules, chemists can gain valuable insights into the electronic structure and excited states of molecules.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

अज्ञेय का वैवाहिक जीवन उतार-चढ़ाव भरा था, वर्णन कीजिए? Aage ka vaivahik jivan utar chadhav bhara tha varnan kijiye

सवाल: अज्ञेय का वैवाहिक जीवन उतार-चढ़ाव भरा था, वर्णन कीजिए? अज्ञेय का वैवाहिक जीवन उतार-चढ़ाव भरा था। उन्होंने दो विवाह किए, लेकिन दोनों विवाह सफल नहीं हो पाए। उनका पहला विवाह 1937 में राजकुमारी रत्नलता से हुआ था। यह विवाह अज्ञेय के परिवार की इच्छा के विरुद्ध था। अज्ञेय के पिता हीरानंद वात्स्यायन संस्कृत के विद्वान थे और वे चाहते थे कि अज्ञेय एक योग्य विदुषी से विवाह करें। रत्नलता एक साधारण परिवार से थीं और वे संस्कृत नहीं जानती थीं। इस कारण से, अज्ञेय के परिवार वालों ने इस विवाह का विरोध किया। अज्ञेय और रत्नलता का विवाह कुछ वर्षों तक चलता रहा, लेकिन अंततः उनका तलाक हो गया। इस तलाक के कई कारण थे, जिनमें अज्ञेय की व्यस्त जीवनशैली, रत्नलता की शिक्षा और सामाजिक पृष्ठभूमि में अंतर, और अज्ञेय के परिवार का विरोध शामिल था। अज्ञेय का दूसरा विवाह 1956 में कपिला मलिक से हुआ था। कपिला एक मशहूर संगीतकार थीं और वे अज्ञेय की साहित्यिक प्रतिभा की प्रशंसक थीं। यह विवाह कुछ वर्षों तक चलता रहा, लेकिन अंततः यह भी विफल हो गया। इस विफलता के कारणों में अज्ञेय के व्यस्त जीवनशैली, कपिला की स्वतंत्रताप्रियता,...

Explain voter apathy indifference among the youth considered a challenge for south africa democracy?

Question: Explain voter apathy indifference among the youth considered a challenge for south africa democracy?  Voter apathy and indifference among the youth pose significant challenges to South Africa's democracy. When young people disengage from the electoral process, it undermines the representativeness and legitimacy of the government. Low youth voter turnout means that the voices and concerns of young South Africans are underrepresented in policymaking, leading to policies that may not adequately address issues crucial to them, such as unemployment, education, and access to healthcare. This lack of participation can also empower special interests and entrenched elites, further marginalizing young people's voices in the political process. Additionally, voter apathy among the youth can contribute to political instability, as a significant portion of the population feels unheard and unrepresented, 

List four social beliefs in south africa that contribute to the high frequency of sexual assault?

Question: List four social beliefs in south africa that contribute to the high frequency of sexual assault? Four societal beliefs in South Africa that contribute to the high frequency of sexual assault include: Gender Inequality and Patriarchy – Deep-rooted patriarchal structures place men in positions of power, leading to the normalization of violence against women and reinforcing male dominance. Victim-Blaming Attitudes – Many believe that victims are responsible for the assault due to their behavior, clothing, or choices, discouraging them from reporting incidents and allowing perpetrators to act without accountability. Cultural Norms Surrounding Masculinity – Traditional views of masculinity emphasize aggression and dominance, leading some men to feel entitled to assert power over women through sexual violence. Silence and Stigma Around Sexual Violence – Many victims fear speaking out due to societal stigma, allowing abuse to go unreported and perpetrators to continue their actions...